Essential Question: What was the nature of cultural contact between the Europeans of Russian America and the Natives of Alaska?
One of Russia’s first areas of interest in Alaska was to make contact with the indigenous people who already lived on the land. As with any two cultures that are meeting for the first time, there were many lessons to be learned and challenges to overcome. The arrival of the Russians impacted many Native societies’ cultures in several ways, including resources and labor, spirituality, and social culture.
Alaska was bountiful to the Russians in resources. Furs and pelts were used for profit by doing business with Chinese traders. However, neither the Russian or Siberian traders hunted the animals. According to the Alaska History and Cultural Studies website, the Natives were forced to hunt and “the Russians took Aleut [Native] women and children as hostages while the hungers gathered pelts.” There was resistance from the Native societies’ part, but the traders who dealt with the hostile Natives responded cruelly. The Russian trading companies in business knew that Native labor was vital to their success, and would at times abuse that knowledge for their own benefit.
Kodiak and Sitka saw its populations grow as trading companies established themselves along the coast. In the late 1700’s, the first Russian-Orthodox priests began to arrive in Alaska. The priests had a goal to assimilate the Native culture. In the Alaska History and Cultural Studies website, “many of the Orthodox missionaries defended Alaska Native people. The tsar in St. Petersburg had always prohibited the poor treatment of Natives, but many fur traders ignored his orders.” One of the Russian Orthodox church’s most important missionaries, Bishop Innocent, became a student of Native culture and attempted to communicate openly with Native societies.
Bishop Innocent of Alaska |
Examine Question: Why were the Russians interested in Alaska? When did the Russians come to Alaska?
In the 15th Century, many countries of power sent forth explorers in search of new lands. During this Age of Exploration, many discoveries were made, by Christopher Columbus to Ferdinand Magellan. Russia also sent forth expeditions in order to be competitive with the Western European powers.
There were several reasons for exploration: finding new trade routes and new people to trade with, discovering new inhabitable lands and sustainable goods, and a desire for geographic knowledge. In the 1400’s, under the rule of Ivan III the Great, Russia was aggressively pushing to extend its empire in order to increase wealth and population. Due to its relatively close proximity, the Alaskan lands sounded like a worthwhile investment of Russia’s time and resources to explore. However, Russia’s “discovery” of Alaska wasn’t recorded until 1741 (Meeting of Frontiers).
The first recorded contact between Russians and Natives on Alaskan land was in 1732 by Mikhail Gvozdev. While sailing north through the Bering Strait, he landed at Cape Prince of Wales and sailed by King Island. Vitus Bering is credited with discovering Alaska (Alaska History and Cultural Studies), although in somewhat of a mysterious manner. After sighting land, Bering sent two separate boats with crewmen to explore the land. No one ever returned. However, two Native boats paddled by Bering’s ship, but would not come aboard. Bering did finally make contact with Alaska Natives while visiting the Shumagin Islands, and was able to exchange items with the people there.
One of the first maps of Alaska, drawn by Vitus Bering. |
This module really clarified some parts of Alaska's history for me. My assumption up to this point was that until America bought the Alaskan land, it was pretty much overrun with the indigenous peoples and Russians - everywhere! It makes sense that Russia would be closely tied to Alaska, but I never gave it any thought that some inhabitants might also include Swedes, Finns, and Germans. I was also surprised that the Russian tsar forbade the mistreatment of Alaska Natives. Maybe it's my cynicism, but for a country that was wanting to expand its wealth and population, you'd think they would take every advantage possible.
Blog Reviews
Hello Kristin,
ReplyDeleteI enjoy reading your blog; the layout is clear and you have a nice writing style.
The essential question you answered is really a tough one, and I applaud you for tackling it. It suggests that you go back and recall topics covered in Module III about cultural contact and culture change. You are correct in noting that the fur trade was one type of culture contact . (By the way, I think that it has become almost a stereotype that the Russians didn't hunt for fur bearing animals. Certainly they used and exploited Native labor and managed the trade, but many of these guys were tough hunters from the Siberian trade, and also worked alongside the Aleuts whom they subjugated.)
The nature of contact was often brutal, while at the same time it was less harsh as there were degrees of mutual benefit in the cultural contact. And, the nature of contact between the priests and the Natives was of a persuasive and "educating" nature as there was a push to bring Natives into the church. Then, as you mention, there were relations between company employees and local women - sometimes recognized by the church and sometimes not. The resulting families generated another type of contact.
So, you see, the nature of contact was quite varied as circumstances varied over time.
The first sentence in the second paragraph for question 2 hits the target. That covers the reasons for exploration. The question suggests that you go beyond this. What are the "reasons for Russian interest"? - That includes not only exploration but colonization/settlement. So, some development of your response would have provided a more complete answer. The description of the Bering voyage wasn't necessary to answer this question.
Yes, isn't it interesting that the R/A company had an ethnic mix of employees? The founding of the Lutheran Church in Sitka, in the 1840's, was due to the fact that a Russian governor was really Finnish.
Peer blog reviews?
Be sure to cite the sources of all images. Have a great weekend. BC
Score for content - Module IV - 3.5
hi kristin...
ReplyDeletenice blog. your design/color/font/structure are attractive, engaging and functional.
nice images and many rich resources linked throughout.
some thoughts:
1. i personally like how you link to images instead of using linked captions. its simple and functional. however, its more more academic to link to descriptive text captions.
2. also try placing images to the right or left so they dont interrupt the flow of the words down the page.
3. no blog reviews this week? ouch!
i hope this info is helpful. your blog is fine and getting better all the time. thanks for your hard work and persistence.
module iv - 3 points