Essential Question: Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act 1971 – Discuss two ways that this legislation has impacted Alaska, and two specific ways that it has impacted Alaska Natives.
Oil platform near Prudhoe Bay Alaska In Pictures |
The Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act had a major impact on Alaska since its inception in 1971, and continues to impact the state today. One of the major affects was on the economy—more specifically, oil. When oil was discovered off the Arctic Coast at Prudhoe Bay in 1968, many people viewed this as an opportunity to make Alaska prosperous. A pipeline needed to be constructed from Prudhoe Bay to Valdez in order to ship the oil to the lower 48. However, this concept was not an easy one, as the intended pipeline was going to cross lands that were claimed by Native Alaskans. If Alaska wanted to profit from this new-found resource, a resolution would need to be found for all parties involved.
The ANCSA also impacted Alaska’s environment. While many Alaskans were excited about the discovery of oil, others were worried about the protection of the state’s resources. “Pressure brought by the environmental movement resulted in a famous clause in the 1971 Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act…which ultimately led to the Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act in 1980” (Explore Alaska!). The Alaska National Interest Lands Conservation Act designated almost 80 million acres of land in Alaska as wilderness areas and National Park Service properties. Environmentalists wanted to ensure that not only did Alaska Natives have rightful claim to traditional properties, but that the land was protected and preserved for future Alaskans.
When the Alaska Native Claims Settlement Act passed, Alaska Natives were rewarded 44 million acres of historically-used land, and nearly $963 billion. These two forms of compensation were dispensed through thirteen native-owned regional corporations. The nearly-80,000 Alaska Natives were encouraged to register in any of the 12 corporations; the 13th corporation was formed for Natives living outside of Alaska (Alaska History and Cultural Studies). To become a shareholder, one had to be one-fourth Alaska Native. The passage of ANCSA allowed Native Alaskans to take pride in the fact that they would have the official title to lands that historically had been theirs (Alaska History and Cultural Studies).
ANCSA protesters Alaska Journal |
Examine Question: Identify the Alaska Senate and House Districts in which you live. Identify the type of local government you have.
State Senator Fred Dyson The Alaska State Legislature |
House Representative Anna Fairclough The Alaska State Legislature |
Eagle River belongs to the Municipality of Anchorage. The Municipality of Anchorage stretches from Eklutna down to Portage. A 2000 census calculated over 260,000 residents living in the municipality, which means that it is home to almost two-fifths of Alaska’s total population (muni.org).
Evaluation
I thought that this was one of the most difficult modules. There were so many topics that were available; sometimes having too many choices makes things harder. I did however appreciate the examine question, in which I needed to research my local government and officials. Previously I have not been an active community member, but I would like to have a better insight into what’s going on in my town.
Blog Reviews
Heather looked at how she can apply the information found in the module to a lesson with her Biology classes (specifically, mines in Alaska).
Brad included a really neat quote with his post: “Alaska does not belong to outsiders…it belongs to no one…we are only caretakers of Haa Shageinyaa’s creation.”
I agree with you that there was so much information in this module with many different choices. You did a nice job with the layout of your blog and your responses!
ReplyDelete